Wussten Sie, dass 10.000 Stunden „entwickelter Praxis“ als Marke gilt, ab der man ein Experte oder eine Expertin ist? Gute Nachrichten: Jeder gunnercooke Partner und jede gunnercooke Partnerin hat schon mehr als 10.000 Stunden anwaltlich gearbeitet. Sie haben hier also nur mit ausgewiesenen Rechts-Expert*innen zu tun.
Contaminated land expert Keith Davidson explains how environmental insurance can play an important role mitigating liability risks in brownfield development projects.
Environmental liabilities – who should pay?
Land contamination and groundwater pollution can be a lottery in brownfield transactions where all parties are left with liability risks after completion.
Developers can miss contamination hotspots and mobilise historic contamination during the remediation and construction work.
Buyers and long leasehold tenants are often asked to provide an indemnity for unknown and unquantified liabilities.
Sellers face liability bounce-back risks as statutory exclusion tests and contractual liability transfer mechanisms are not guaranteed to work.
Funders are usually only offered a reliance letter that provides minimal protection.
Liabilities for land contamination and water pollution
Third party liabilities
Clean up obligations under planning controls
Private nuisance claims for off-site migration
Landlord and tenant claims
Clean-up, investigation and monitoring costs
Contaminated land regime
Public nuisance claims
Indemnities in sale contracts
Loss of property value
Environmental damage regulations
Claims relating to negligent advice
Indemnities in corporate agreements
Delay or aborted transactions
Water pollution legislation
Personal injury claims
Environmental permitting regime
When is environmental insurance appropriate?
If an environmental report identifies concerns, insurance can be useful option – particularly in the following scenarios:
Stalemate over the allocation of environmental liabilities
Concerns regarding indemnity covenant strength or lack of guarantor
Unknown liabilities associated with offsite migration
Significant risk of construction activities mobilising existing contamination
Phased approach for insurance protection
There are three types of environmental insurance policies to consider – contaminated land indemnity policies, site pollution liability (SPL) policies and contractor pollution liability (CPL) policies.
Environmental insurance doesn’t cover remediation costs and site investigations required under planning controls, so there needs to be a combination of policies – ie CPL cover during the construction phase and SPL or indemnity policy cover after the planning conditions have been discharged.
Type of policy
What it covers
Contaminated land indemnity policy
Offers minimal protection for brownfield sites Really only suitable after planning has been discharged and where the buyer takes on liabilities under the contaminated land regime (ie Part 2A only) Responds if a regulator threatens to serve a remediation notice. Covers remediation costs, legal fees and loss of property value
Site investigations, and redevelopment Civil claims Non-Part 2A regulatory action Spills from storage tanks
15 – 25 years
Less than £5,000
Site Pollution Liability (SPL) policy
Comprehensive protection for onsite and offsite contamination Regulatory actionThird party claimsContractual liabilities
Site investigations and redevelopment
5 or 10 years
£50,000 to £150,000
Contractors Pollution Liability (CPL) policy
Remediation or construction activities disturb the ground and mobilise existing contaminants
Some insurers will exclude high risk known issues
Typically 20% of SPL premium
The phased approach for environmental insurance at brownfield sites means that SPL and CPL insurance applies at different stages.
Off Site Cover Only
Off Site Cover Only
On and Off Site Cover
Cover for site investigations
It is important to get a specialist broker and environmental lawyer involved at an early stage to summarise the options, exclusions and potential gaps in cover.
Environmental liability risks for residual contamination
After a brownfield site has been investigated and remediated under planning controls, residual contamination will remain a concern.
In addition to contamination that has been missed and unknown historic offsite migration, the construction activities can disturb the ground and mobilise historic contamination.
The seller, developer, purchaser, tenant and funder can all face ongoing environmental liabilities.
Who is liable?
Remains legally liable after sale if targeted as causer or knowing permitter. Extra risks if the developer mobilises existing contaminants
Legally liable for remediation during planning and for mobilising contaminants. Will often need to indemnify the seller
Legally liable as new owner, knowing permitter and takes on the seller’s liabilities if the site is sold with information. Often indemnifies the seller
Contractually liable under the compliance with statutory requirements or yield up covenants. Even with a tenant protection clause, can indemnify the landlord for new and aggravated contamination
Contamination liabilities can reduce the value of the lender’s security and credit-worthiness of the borrower
In the Sandridge case, a developer was deemed to have “caused” groundwater contamination by removing hardstanding at a former chemical site. Rainfall washed bromate contamination into the underlying chalk aquifer resulting in a 20km groundwater plume and over £16m clean up liabilities and compensation to damaged parties. The court held that both the developer and chemical company were legally liable.
When the stakes are high, a combination of environmental lawyer and specialist broker advice is required.
Environmental insurance broker
Interpreting environmental reports and providing liability advice and tactics
Approaching the insurers with the greatest appetite for particular type of risks
Drafting and negotiating environmental provisions in sale contracts, development agreements and leases
Recommending the most appropriate policy and providing assistance to the lawyer in negotiations
Negotiating environmental insurance policy wording and providing summary of coverage
Negotiating policy wording and binding cover
Manage Cookie Consent
Wir verwenden Technologien wie Cookies, um Geräteinformationen zu speichern und/oder darauf zuzugreifen. Wir tun dies, um das Browsing-Erlebnis zu verbessern und (nicht) personalisierte Werbung zu zeigen. Wenn Sie diesen Technologien zustimmen, können wir Daten wie das Surfverhalten oder eindeutige IDs auf dieser Website verarbeiten. Wenn Sie Ihre Zustimmung nicht erteilen oder zurückziehen, können bestimmte Merkmale und Funktionen beeinträchtigt werden.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.